O uso de experts em controvérsias ambientais perante a Corte Internacional de Justiça
Résumé
Mots-clés
Texte intégral :
PDF (Português (Brasil))Références
BORDIN, Fernando Lusa. Procedural developments at the international court of justice. The law and practice of international courts and tribunals, n. 13, 2014.
BOYLE, Alan. Environmental dispute settlement. In: MAX Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 2009.
BOYLE, Alan; HARRISON, James. Judicial settlement of international environmental disputes: current problems. Journal of international dispute settlement, 2013, v. 4, p. 245.
CANÇADO TRINDADE, A. A. Os tribunais internacionais contemporaneos. Brasilia: Funag, 2013.
COELHO, Luciana Fernandes. Reflexões provenientes do dissenso: uma análise crítica a respeito do caso Austrália versus Japão perante a Corte Internacional de Justiça. Revista de Direito Internacional, Brasília, v. 12, 2015.
D’ASPREMONT, Jean; MBENGUE, Makane. Strategies of engagement with scientific fact-finding in international adjudication. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, v. 5, p. 240–272, 2014.
DAL RI JUNIOR, Arno; NOSCHANG, Patrícia G. Contradições e dilemas no itinerário histórico da tutela do Meio Ambiente no Mercosul. In: BAPTISTA, Luiz Olavo; RAMINA, Larissa; FRIEDRICH, Tatyana Scheila (Org.). Direito internacional contemporâneo. Curitiba: Juruá, 2014. p. 45-86.
FITZMAURICE, Malgosia. Case Analysis: the gabcíkovo-nagymaros case: the law of treaties. Leiden Journal of International Law, v. 11, p. 321-344, 1998.
FITZMAURICE, Malgosia. The international court of justice and the environment. Non-State Actors and International Law, v. 4, 2004.
FOSTER, Caroline. New clothes for the emperor? consultation of experts by the international court of justice. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, n. 5, v.32, 2013.
FOSTER, Caroline. Science and the precautionary principle in international courts and tribunals: expert evidence, burden of proof and finality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
GAJA, Giorgio. The protection of general interests in the international community. Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, n. 364, p. 171-181, 2011.
GALINDO, G. R. B. A Paz (ainda) pela Jurisdição Compulsória? Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, v. 57, p. 82-98, 2014.
GRAY, Christine. The 2014 judicial activity of the international court of justice. American Journal of International Law, n. 109, p. 589-602, 2015.
HARRISON, James. Reflections on the role of international courts and tribunals in the settlement of environmental disputes and the development of international environmental law. Journal of Environmental Law, n. 25, 2013.
JENNINGS, Robert. The role of the international court of justice in the development of international environment protection law. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, n. 1, v. 240, 2004.
KLEIN, N. Whales and tuna: the past and future of litigation between Australia and Japan. The Georgetown international environmental law review, n. 21, 2009.
LIMA, Lucas C. The evidential weight of experts before the icj: reflections on the whaling in the antarctic case. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, v. 6, p. 621635, 2015.
MBENGUE, Makane. Between Law and Science: A commentary on the whaling in the antarctic case. QIL-Questions of International Law, n. 14, p. 8–9, 2015. Available in: www.qil-qdi.org/between-law-and-science-a-commentaryon-the-whaling-in-the-antarctic-case-2/. Accessed: 04 Apr. 2016.
PEAT, Daniel. The use of court-appointed experts by the international court of justice. British Yearbook of International Law, n. 84, v. 288, 2014.
QUINTANA, J. J. Litigation at the international court of justice. Leiden: Brill, 2015.
RANGEL, Vicente Marotta. Evolução da Justiça Internacional. In: MEDEIROS, Antônio Paulo Cachapuz (Org.). Desafios do direito internacional contemporâneo: jornadas de direito internacional público no Itamaraty. Brasília: Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão, 2007.
RIDDELL, Anna; PLANT, Brendan. Evidence before the international court of justice. London, BIICL 2009.
ROSENNE, Shabtai. Fact-finding before the international court of justice. In: ROSENNE, Shabtai. Essays on international law and practice. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007. p. 242.
SANDS, Philippe. International environmental litigation and its future. University of Richmond Law Review, v. 32, 2009.
SAVADOGO, Louis. Le recours des juridictions internationales à des experts. Annuaire Français de Droit International, v. 50, 2004.
SCOVAZZI, Tulio. Between law and science: some considerations inspired by the whaling in the antarctic judgment. QIL-Questions of International Law, n. 14, 2015.Available in:www.qil-qdi.org/between-law-and-sciencesome-considerations-inspired-by-the-whaling-in-the-antarctic-judgment-2/. Accessed: 04 Apr. 2016.
SIMMA, Bruno. The international court of justice and scientific expertise. Proc. of the Annual Meeting ASIL, n. 106, v. 230, 2012.
STEPHENS, Tim. International environmental disputes: to sue or not to sue. In: KLEIN, Natalie (Ed.). Litigating international law disputes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
TAMS, Christian. Article 49, article 50 e article 51. In: ZIMMERMANN, Andreas et. al. (Eds.). The statute of the international court of justice: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
THOUVENIN, Jean-Marc. La descente de la cour sur les lieux dans l’affaire relative au projet gabcikovo-nagymaros. Annuaire Français de Droit International, v. 43, 1997.
TREVES, Tullio. Coastal states’ rights in the maritime areas under UNCLOS. Revista de Direito Internacional, Brasília, n. 1, v. 12, 2015.
VARELLA, Marcelo D. A necessidade de repensar os mecanismos da responsabilidade ambiental em caso de riscos de vazamento de petróleo na zona econômica exclusiva no Brasil. Revista de Direito Internacional, Brasília v. 12, p. 240-249, 2015.
VINUALES, Jorge. Legal techniques for dealing with scientific uncertainty in environmental law. Vanderbilt journal of transnational law, v. 43, 2010.
VINUALES, Jorge. The contribution of the international court of justice to the development of international environmental law: a contemporary assessment. Fordham international law journal, v. 32, 2008.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v13i2.4056
ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)
Desenvolvido por:
